{
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "source": "vibemath",
  "problem_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
  "title": "Counting Linear Extensions Below the $2^n$ Barrier",
  "canonical_statement": "Koivisto asked at Dagstuhl in 2013 whether the linear extensions of an arbitrary $n$-element poset can be counted exactly in time $O^*(c^n)$ for some $c < 2$. Yes: a deterministic exact algorithm runs in $O^*(1.89^n)$, breaking the $2^n$ barrier for the general problem.",
  "plain_summary": "VibeMathed reports this item as candidate. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.",
  "current_status": "candidate",
  "solution_events": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:event",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
      "type": "proved",
      "status": "candidate",
      "occurred_at": "2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z",
      "title": "Breaking the $2^n$ Barrier for Counting Linear Extensions with a Short Elementary Algorithm",
      "summary": "VibeMathed reports this item as candidate. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.",
      "ai_contribution": "ai_discovered",
      "attempt_ids": [
        "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:attempt"
      ],
      "method_family_ids": [
        "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:method"
      ],
      "source_assertion_ids": [
        "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:assertion"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "attempts": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:attempt",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
      "model": "Claude Opus 5, ChatGPT 5.6 Sol",
      "provider": "Anthropic, OpenAI",
      "attempted_at": "2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z",
      "human_collaborators": [
        "Keigo Oka"
      ],
      "exposure": "unknown",
      "prompt_public": null,
      "outcome": "The paper's disclosure: \"The core mathematical ideas underlying the new part of the algorithm and proof were discovered by Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) during AI-assisted mathematical exploration\" - naming the first-upper-element pattern representation, multiplicity-profile decoding, the deadline dynamic program and the state-counting strategy of Sections 3 to 5. The chain-partition bound of Section 2 refines Kozma and is not new. The research prompt supplied to Claude Opus 5 was itself generated by ChatGPT 5.6 Sol, modelled on OpenAI's publicly released prompt for their cycle double cover work.",
      "failed_routes": [],
      "artifacts": [],
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Breaking the $2^n$ Barrier for Counting Linear Extensions with a Short Elementary Algorithm",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19505",
          "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
          "license": null
        },
        {
          "label": "VibeMathed: Counting Linear Extensions Below the $2^n$ Barrier",
          "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
          "kind": "source-assertion",
          "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
        }
      ],
      "cost_usd": null,
      "independence": "unknown"
    }
  ],
  "verifications": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:verification",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
      "solution_event_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:event",
      "level": "unreviewed",
      "mathematical_correctness": "unknown",
      "statement_fidelity": "unaudited",
      "peer_review": "none",
      "verifier": "VibeMathed (source-reported label)",
      "verified_at": null,
      "note": "Checked by this site on 21 August 2026 against the paper (arXiv:2608.19505v1): the disclosure is verbatim as quoted and Koivisto's Dagstuhl 2013 question is cited in the abstract. This is an exact deterministic algorithm with a proved worst-case bound, not a heuristic, so it clears the methodology's exclusion. The ancillary Python script cross-checks correctness against brute force on small posets and does not certify the running time; it was not re-run here. Days-old preprint, no independent review.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "VibeMathed: Counting Linear Extensions Below the $2^n$ Barrier",
          "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
          "kind": "source-assertion",
          "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
        },
        {
          "label": "Breaking the $2^n$ Barrier for Counting Linear Extensions with a Short Elementary Algorithm",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19505",
          "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
          "license": null
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "label": "Breaking the $2^n$ Barrier for Counting Linear Extensions with a Short Elementary Algorithm",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19505",
      "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
      "license": null
    },
    {
      "label": "VibeMathed: Counting Linear Extensions Below the $2^n$ Barrier",
      "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
      "kind": "source-assertion",
      "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
    }
  ],
  "recommended_mode": "verify",
  "recommended_exposure": "result_only",
  "opportunity_signals": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n:signal:verify_now",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:counting-linear-extensions-below-two-to-the-n",
      "kind": "verify_now",
      "reason": "The source labels this result as a candidate; verification should precede reuse.",
      "generated_at": "2026-09-13T16:28:40.178Z"
    }
  ],
  "uncertainties": [
    "The source status is candidate and must not be represented as solved.",
    "VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.",
    "AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.",
    "VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim."
  ],
  "generated_at": "2026-09-13T16:28:40.178Z"
}
