{
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "source": "vibemath",
  "problem_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
  "title": "North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices",
  "canonical_statement": "Let $A(k)$ be the largest possible number of moves in a north-east lattice path whose visited vertices contain no $k$ collinear points. Gerver (1979) and Gerver and Ramsey (1979) bounded $A(k)$ by\n$$\\exp\\left(\\Omega\\left(\\log(k)^2\\right)\\right) \\le A(k) \\le \\exp\\left(O\\left(k^4\\right)\\right),$$\nand determining the true growth rate has been open since. Both bounds are improved to\n$$\\exp\\left(\\Omega\\left(k^{1/3}\\right)\\right) \\le A(k) \\le \\exp\\left(O\\left(k^2\\right)\\right),$$\nwith the upper bound proved in the sharper form $\\exp\\left(\\left(\\tfrac{2}{e}+o(1)\\right)(k-1)^2\\right)$.",
  "plain_summary": "VibeMathed reports this item as partial. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.",
  "current_status": "partial",
  "solution_events": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:event",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
      "type": "proved",
      "status": "partial",
      "occurred_at": "2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "title": "North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices (arXiv)",
      "summary": "Both bounds move, and the gap stays enormous: the lower bound rises from $\\exp(\\Omega(\\log^2 k))$ to $\\exp(\\Omega(k^{1/3}))$ and the upper falls from $\\exp(O(k^4))$ to $\\exp(O(k^2))$, so $A(k)$ is still undetermined between an exponent of $k^{1/3}$ and one of $k^2$. The paper's own closing discussion argues its lower-bound construction is near the limit of the method and that beating it needs additional randomness, a sharper line-counting step, or a different model entirely.",
      "ai_contribution": "ai_assisted",
      "attempt_ids": [
        "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:attempt"
      ],
      "method_family_ids": [
        "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:method"
      ],
      "source_assertion_ids": [
        "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:assertion"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "attempts": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:attempt",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
      "model": "GPT-5.5 Pro",
      "provider": "OpenAI",
      "attempted_at": "2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "human_collaborators": [
        "Samuel Korsky"
      ],
      "exposure": "unknown",
      "prompt_public": null,
      "outcome": "The acknowledgement in full: the author was assisted by GPT-5.5 Pro in preparing the paper, but \"the main construction ideas, including the dyadic-interval random variables in the lower bound and the density-increment framework in the upper bound, were due to the author\". AI tools checked computations, assisted with drafting, and improved the upper-bound constant by suggesting the use of the mediant of the relevant Farey fractions. That last contribution is traceable in the text: it lifts the density increment from $(1/8-o(1))(k-1)^{-2}$ to $(1/4-o(1))(k-1)^{-2}$, which is what produces the $2/e$ constant. So the model sharpened the constant inside the new upper bound rather than the exponent, which is the lower tier by this site's definition.",
      "failed_routes": [],
      "artifacts": [
        {
          "label": "Gerver, Long walks in the plane with few collinear points (Pacific J. Math. 83, 1979)",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1979.83.349",
          "kind": "problem-record",
          "license": null
        },
        {
          "label": "Gerver and Ramsey, On certain sequences of lattice points (Pacific J. Math. 83, 1979)",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1979.83.357",
          "kind": "problem-record",
          "license": null
        },
        {
          "label": "Lidbetter, Improved bound for the Gerver-Ramsey collinearity problem (Discrete Math., 2024)",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2023.113718",
          "kind": "paper",
          "license": null
        },
        {
          "label": "Barnoff and Bright, North-East lattice paths avoiding k collinear points via satisfiability (2026)",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2026.103112",
          "kind": "paper",
          "license": null
        }
      ],
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices (arXiv)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02832",
          "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
          "license": null
        },
        {
          "label": "VibeMathed: North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices",
          "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
          "kind": "source-assertion",
          "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
        }
      ],
      "cost_usd": null,
      "independence": "unknown"
    }
  ],
  "verifications": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:verification",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
      "solution_event_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:event",
      "level": "unreviewed",
      "mathematical_correctness": "unknown",
      "statement_fidelity": "unaudited",
      "peer_review": "none",
      "verifier": "VibeMathed (source-reported label)",
      "verified_at": null,
      "note": "Checked by this site on 17 August 2026 against the paper's LaTeX (arXiv:2607.02832, Korsky, 2 July 2026). The abstract matches this entry, and the acknowledgement is verbatim as the AI-role note now quotes it - including the sentence attributing the main construction ideas to the author, which the submission's quote had omitted. The model's named contribution was traced through the text to the density-increment step it actually improves. The prior bounds attribute correctly: Gerver, Pacific J. Math. 83 (1979) 349-355, and Gerver-Ramsey, same volume, 357-363. The proofs themselves - a dyadic slope-field random construction and a Farey-mediant density increment - were not checked here and need a discrete geometer. Unrefereed preprint, no independent review.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "VibeMathed: North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices",
          "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
          "kind": "source-assertion",
          "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
        },
        {
          "label": "North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices (arXiv)",
          "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02832",
          "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
          "license": null
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "label": "North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices (arXiv)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02832",
      "kind": "primary-mathematical-source",
      "license": null
    },
    {
      "label": "VibeMathed: North-East Lattice Paths with Few Collinear Vertices",
      "url": "https://vibemathed.com/problem/north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
      "kind": "source-assertion",
      "license": "https://vibemathed.com/data-license"
    }
  ],
  "recommended_mode": "expand",
  "recommended_exposure": "result_only",
  "opportunity_signals": [
    {
      "id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices:signal:recent_partial_result",
      "problem_id": "vibemathed:north-east-lattice-paths-with-few-collinear-vertices",
      "kind": "recent_partial_result",
      "reason": "A source-reported partial result may support bounded expansion.",
      "generated_at": "2026-09-13T16:28:40.178Z"
    }
  ],
  "uncertainties": [
    "VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.",
    "AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.",
    "VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim."
  ],
  "generated_at": "2026-09-13T16:28:40.178Z"
}
