Problem detail · source-aware

Han's Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

For a finite-dimensional algebra $A$, finite global dimension forces $\mathrm{HH}_n(A) = 0$ for all large $n$. Han conjectured the converse: eventual vanishing of Hochschild homology should detect homological smoothness. Disproved by an explicit finite-dimensional $\mathbb{C}$-algebra with $\mathrm{HH}_n(A) = 0$ for every $n \geq 1$ and $\mathrm{gldim}\, A = \infty$, built by transporting Krah's phantom into a singularity category via one-periodic folding.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra

The paper's acknowledgment in full: "The counterexample presented in this paper was discovered with the assistance of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra model. All mathematical arguments and references were independently verified by the authors." In a counterexample paper the algebra is the whole result, so crediting the model with its discovery is a claim about the central object, not about support work. The hedge "with the assistance of" keeps this below the top tier.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

A preprint days old with no independent review. The surrounding evidence is unusually strong for something this new: two of the three authors disproved the differential-graded analogue of the same conjecture in December 2025, this paper extends that program, and the construction runs on named recent machinery (Krah's phantom from Inventiones 2024, Chen's partial-resolution theorem, the Wang-Arunachalam-Keller identification) rather than novel unpublished tools. That is provenance, not verification, and the tier reflects the difference.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv

    The counterexample is an ordinary algebra concentrated in degree zero, with the strongest possible vanishing in positive degrees, so the phenomenon needs no grading or differential. Liu and Shen had already disproved the differential-graded version in December 2025 without any AI involvement; the classical case is the one that fell with a model in the loop.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.