Problem detail · source-aware

Anderson's Quasi-Completeness Question

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Is every weakly quasi-complete Noetherian local ring quasi-complete? Asked by D. D. Anderson in 2014. The ring $A = k^p[[X, Y]][k]$ with $k = \mathbb{F}_p(u_1, u_2, \dots)$ is weakly quasi-complete but not quasi-complete.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

Rethlas + Archon (GPT-5.4 Pro)

The dual-agent framework (Rethlas for informal reasoning, Archon for formal verification) ran roughly 80 hours; the decisive example is a classical ring going back to Nagata, which the system recognized as answering Anderson's question.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

lean verified statement audited

Lean-checked with a statement comparator guarding against misformalization; arXiv preprint documents the pipeline.

Correctness: supported · statement fidelity: audited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2604.03789 - Automated conjecture resolution with formal verification

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.