Problem detail · source-aware

The Axiotis-Sviridenko Condition-Number Conjecture

partialconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as partial. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Axiotis and Sviridenko conjectured that the linear dependence on the restricted condition number in sparse convex optimization cannot be improved by a polynomial-time algorithm. Their conjectured lower bound is established for least-squares objectives, conditional on the randomized exact-volume Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis in the weighted regular-graph formulation of Raghavendra, Steurer and Tulsiani.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

Gemini-based agentic system (internal)

The acknowledgements state that the proof was first obtained using a fully automated Gemini-based agentic system developed internally at Google, with the authors verifying it and editing for presentation.

Provider: Google · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2608.02588 - The Condition-Number Barrier in Sparse Least Squares

    Conditional on the randomized exact-volume Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis, and stated for least-squares objectives rather than sparse convex optimization in general.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.