Problem detail · source-aware

Batyrev's Stringy Hodge Number Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

For a projective variety $X$ with at worst Gorenstein canonical singularities whose stringy $E$-function $E_{\mathrm{st}}(X; u, v)$ is a polynomial, all stringy Hodge numbers $h^{p,q}_{\mathrm{st}}(X)$ are non-negative. (Batyrev 1998, Conjecture 3.10.)

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT

Satriano and Usatine found the counterexample with the assistance of GPT: $X = M_0 \times \mathbb{P}^1$, where $M_0$ is the coarse moduli space of rank-2 semistable bundles with trivial determinant over a genus-3 curve. $X$ is a 7-dimensional projective variety with Gorenstein terminal singularities whose stringy $E$-function is a polynomial, yet its stringy Hodge number $h^{2,5}_{\mathrm{st}}(X) = -1$ is negative.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

arXiv preprint 2607.19184 (21 Jul 2026) by Matthew Satriano and Jeremy Usatine. The proof is short and fully explicit: the stringy $E$-function is written out and its $u^2 v^5$ coefficient gives $h^{2,5}_{\mathrm{st}} = -1$, so it is hand-verifiable. A domain-expert preprint, not yet peer-reviewed. Distinct from the unrelated Batyrev-Manin conjecture on rational points.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.19184

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.