Problem detail · source-aware

Brezis's Open Problem 5.6 on Universal Fourier Summation

partialconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as partial. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Does a universal summation process recover the degree of a circle map from its Fourier moduli, that is, does $\sum_n \sigma_{n,\varepsilon} n |\hat f(n)|^2 \to \deg f$ hold for Holder maps below the threshold? No. For every $0 < \alpha < 1/3$ there is an $f \in C^{0,\alpha}(S^1;S^1)$ for which the sum fails to converge to $\deg f$, answering Open Problem 5.6 from Brezis's list of favourite open problems negatively for all $p > 3$. The endpoint $C^{0,1/3}$ is left unresolved.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT

The disclosure states that ChatGPT generated preliminary drafts of the proofs in the manuscript. The author then verified each argument in detail, revised the proofs where necessary, checked the cited sources, determined the final formulation of all results, and takes sole responsibility for the content.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Single-author arXiv preprint; the construction combines degree-zero quotients of Blaschke factors with a Baire category argument. Not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.23598 - Nonexistence of universal Fourier summation formulas for the degree below the Holder threshold

    negative below the 1/3 threshold; the endpoint case is still open

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.