Brualdi's Question on Hamiltonicity of Interchange Graphs
resolvedconfidence 70%
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Precise statement
The interchange graph $G(R,S)$ has the $(0,1)$-matrices with row sums $R$ and column sums $S$ as vertices, adjacent when they differ by a single $2\times 2$ interchange. Brualdi asked whether $G(R,S)$ is always Hamiltonian. It satisfies more: it is maximally Hamiltonian, Hamilton-laceable when bipartite and Hamilton-connected when not.
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement
fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
What AI did
Claude, GPT/Codex
The declaration says the computational search and verification programs and the Lean 4 formalization were developed with AI-assisted tools under author direction, and that no AI system is an author. The structural induction carrying the proof is the authors'.
The paper reports a Lean 4 formalization alongside computational search and verification programs. We have not compiled it. arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.
arXiv:2607.13165 - Interchange graphs of (0,1)-matrices are maximally Hamiltonian
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Known method families
argument (source-reported)
Source-reported tools: argument.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
What remains uncertain
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.
VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.