Problem detail · source-aware

Carlson's Associated-Prime Depth Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Is the depth of the mod-$p$ cohomology ring of every finite group realized as the dimension of one of its associated primes? For $G = \operatorname{SmallGroup}(128, 859)$ over $\overline{\mathbb{F}}_2$ the ring has depth $2$ while every associated-prime quotient has dimension at least $3$.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

TARS agent system

The candidate group was found by the TARS agent system (foundation model not disclosed); the counterexample is certified by exact GAP/Singular computations audited by the human authors.

Provider: unknown · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Exact computational certificate (verifier and certificates ship with the paper, checkable with the Python standard library alone) plus a human proof audit. Not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.23732 - An exact counterexample to Carlson's associated-prime depth conjecture

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.