Finitude of the Fibers of Complementary Bell Numbers
resolvedconfidence 70%
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Precise statement
Subbarao and Verma asked in 1999 (Problem 5.7, first part) whether the complementary Bell numbers $f(n) = B_n(-1)$ take any given value only finitely many times. Campbell proves they do: for every fixed integer the fiber is finite, a result whose techniques connect to Wilf's conjecture on the vanishing of $f(n)$.
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement
fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
What AI did
GPT-5.6 Pro
Solved "through our extensive interactions with GPT-5.6 Pro" during the exploratory and proof-development stages; all AI-generated suggestions were substantially revised, corrected and independently verified by the author.
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Known method families
argument (source-reported)
Source-reported tools: argument.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
What remains uncertain
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.
VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.