The Leading Constant for Large-Order Davenport-Schinzel Sequences

Precise statement

Wellman and Pettie noted that the true leading constant for large-order Davenport-Schinzel sequences was known only to lie in an interval. The paper improves the Roselle-Stanton lower bound to match the pigeonhole upper bound in the leading term, resolving the constant to exactly 1/2.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

Claude 4.6, GPT 5.2

"Claude 4.6 and GPT 5.2 were used for proof development, exposition, and revision." No individual step is attributed, so the lower tier applies per the methodology.

Provider: Anthropic, OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

No verification note supplied.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

1. 2026-02-17

   arXiv

   VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

• VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
• AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
• VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.