Problem detail · source-aware

Erdős Problem #106

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

If $f(n)$ is the maximum total side length of $n$ interior-disjoint squares packed in the unit square, is $f(k^2 + 1) = k$? An exact rational configuration packs $17$ squares with total side length greater than $4$, refuting the identity at $k = 4$.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

Claude Opus 5

The public Lean source credits Codex as formal author; The packing was discovered by Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) against search infrastructure built and run by the submitter, and verified independently in exact rational arithmetic via separating-axis certificates.

Provider: Anthropic · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

lean verified statement audited

A 613-line, placeholder-free Lean proof of the counterexample; the erdosproblems.com page has now the result and is showing the conjecture as disproved.

Correctness: supported · statement fidelity: audited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. erdosproblems.com/106

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

computation (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: computation.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.