Problem detail · source-aware

Erdos's Conjecture on Consecutive Integers Free of Certain Prime Factors

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Let $n_k$ be the least $n > 2k$ such that $(n-k)(n-k+1)\cdots(n-1)$ has no prime factor in $(k, 2k)$. Erdos conjectured a superpolynomial lower bound; for all large $k$, $n_k > e^{\log^2 k / (20 \log\log k)}$.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT 5.5 Pro, Aristotle

The paper says the bound was conceived of by ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and that the original paper the model wrote remains publicly available, so the provenance is checkable rather than asserted. The supporting proofs were obtained by Harmonic's Aristotle and are stated to be fully self-contained.

Provider: OpenAI / Harmonic · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Proofs produced by an automated theorem prover and described as fully self-contained; we have not independently checked them. arXiv preprint, not peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2606.19863 - Consecutive integers free of certain prime factors

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.