Problem detail · source-aware

Graffiti Conjecture 6

candidateconfidence 50%

VibeMathed reports this item as candidate. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Every finite connected simple graph G satisfies $$\alpha(G)\ge r(G)+\ln(\rho(G)),$$ where $\alpha(G)$ is the independence number, $r(G)$ is the radius, and $\rho(G)$ is the minimum number of pairwise vertex-disjoint paths whose vertices cover $V(G)$.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Thinking

GPT-5.6 Thinking produced and checked an infinite family of counterexamples. For each integer s >= 0, it considered a tree T_s formed from the path v_0v_1...v_{4s+7} by attaching leaves at v_{2s+2} and v_{2s+5}. It proved that $$\alpha(T_s)=2s+5,\qquad r(T_s)=2s+4,\qquad \rho(T_s)=3.$$ Since $\ln 3>1$, it follows that $$\alpha(T_s)=2s+5<2s+4+\ln 3=r(T_s)+\ln\rho(T_s).$$ Thus every T_s is a counterexample, disproving the conjecture and providing infinitely many counterexamples. The AI also audited the final proof line by line.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

The proof was checked line by line by GPT-5.6 Thinking. The radius, independence number, perfect matching, and path-covering number arguments were separately recomputed, including the smallest case s=0. The proof appears mathematically valid, but as of 2026-07-30 it has not been independently verified by an external graph theorist, a formal proof assistant, or peer review.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. Graffiti Conjecture 6 Counterexample

    Infinite family of counterexamples; mathematical argument internally checked, with external verification and novelty review pending.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • The source status is candidate and must not be represented as solved.
  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.