Unit-Area Triangles in Planar Sets of Large Measure
resolvedconfidence 70%
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Precise statement
How large can a measurable $A \subseteq [0,R]^2$ be while avoiding the vertices of upward-oriented axis-aligned right triangles of area $1/2$? At most $O_c(R^2/(\log R)^c)$, with a matching-shaped lower bound construction.
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement
fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
What AI did
ChatGPT 5.4 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Pro
The AI usage declaration names two distinct contributions: ChatGPT 5.4 Pro constructed the example giving the lower bound, and was also used to clarify a cryptic remark of Graham and reconstruct its intended proof. Gemini drew a figure. The authors state the ideas, proofs and writing are theirs.
arXiv:2605.30033 - On hyperbolic corners and unit-area triangles in planar sets of large measure
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Known method families
argument (source-reported)
Source-reported tools: argument.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
What remains uncertain
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.
VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.