Problem detail · source-aware

The Kim-Roush Conjecture on the Maximum of per(I-A) in Odd Order

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

For the set of $n \times n$ doubly stochastic matrices, Kim and Roush conjectured in 1981 that for odd $n = 2k+1 > 1$ the maximum of $\mathrm{per}(I-A)$ equals $3 \cdot 2^{k-2}$, attained by an explicit block construction. Proved in full, and the maximizers are classified: they are exactly the simultaneous-permutation conjugates of that construction.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5

The acknowledgments are one sentence and leave nothing to interpret: "The proof of this conjecture was carried out by GPT-5.6-sol and Claude Fable 5, under the guidance of the author. The author has reviewed the resulting proof arguments. Responsibility for the final text rests with the author."

Provider: OpenAI, Anthropic · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

A preprint days old, with no independent review.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv

    Kim and Roush did not claim uniqueness; the classification of equality cases is new alongside the conjecture itself.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.