Problem detail · source-aware

Köthe Conjecture

candidateconfidence 50%

VibeMathed reports this item as candidate. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Köthe's conjecture asks whether the sum of two nil left ideals of a ring is always nil. Equivalently, by Krempa's 1972 formulation, if $I$ is a nil two-sided ideal of a ring $R$, then the matrix ideal $M_n(I)$ should be nil for every finite $n$, already for $n=2$. The conjecture is false: there exists a ring $R$, a nil two-sided ideal $I\subseteq R$, and a $2\times 2$ matrix with entries in $I$ that is not nilpotent.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-6 Astra (pre-release)

A pre-release GPT-6 Astra autonomously attempted the open Formal Conjectures benchmark statement, with no human steering during the run, and constructed both the mathematical counterexample and its Lean proof. It builds a nil algebra from three weighted backward shifts over $\overline{\mathbb F_2}$, arranges a universal mortality property for all elements, and simultaneously constructs a $2\times2$ matrix over the resulting nil ideal that has a nonzero eigenvalue and hence is not nilpotent. Claude was later used to generate repository documentation from the completed proof; it was not the mathematical solver.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

lean verified statement audited

Lean-verified on this site's ladder: kernel-checked, and the statement was written independently of the prover. Checked here on 5 September 2026 from a clone at b052755: 3,331 lines of Lean, zero `sorry` outside the Challenge.lean stub, zero `axiom` declarations, no `native_decide`, `unsafe` or `implemented_by` (two uses of `decide` on small numerals), mathlib pinned, Comparator in CI with the three standard axioms. The compared statement is byte-identical to Formal Conjectures' `KotherConjecture.variants.general_matrix` at 9cbe1d3c, and its one nontrivial ingredient, mathlib's `TwoSidedIdeal.matrix`, is the ideal of matrices whose every entry lies in I, so the statement is Krempa's matrix form as intended. What the kernel has certified is therefore: a ring with a nil ideal I and a non-nilpotent matrix in M_2(I). That Köthe's original statement implies the matrix form is an elementary argument (M_n(I) is a sum of n nil column left ideals) stated in the repository and not formalized; Formal Conjectures opened a PR on 4 September relating the formulations. Candidate because no ring theorist has read it yet, and the machine-generated proof account is unaudited.

Correctness: supported · statement fidelity: audited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. Github

    GPT-6 Astra constructs a unital algebra $R=k\oplus A$ over the countable field $$ k=\overline{\mathbb F_2}, $$ with $I=A$ a nil two-sided ideal, together with a matrix $$ W\in M_2(I) $$ that is not nilpotent. The algebra $A$ is generated by three weighted backward shifts. A diagonal construction chooses the weights so that every element of $A$ is nilpotent. At the same time, a suitable polynomial combination of the shifts fixes a nonzero vector; this yields a companion-type matrix with a nonzero eigenvalue, and hence a nonnilpotent matrix whose entries lie in $I$. This formally disproves Krempa's matrix formulation of Köthe's conjecture.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • The source status is candidate and must not be represented as solved.
  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.