Problem detail · source-aware

Kotzig's Perfect 1-Factorisation Conjecture, Asymptotically

partialconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as partial. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Kotzig conjectured that for every even $n \ge 4$ the complete graph $K_n$ decomposes into $n-1$ perfect matchings such that every pair of them forms a Hamilton cycle. An asymptotic version holds: $K_n$ decomposes into $n-1$ perfect matchings of which $(1-o(1))n$ have the property that any pair forms a Hamilton cycle.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT 5.4

The authors state that the construction in Theorem 1.3, a generalisation of the one in their introduction, was generated by ChatGPT 5.4, which also supplied a correct but long proof of it. The proof they present is a cleaner and substantially different one of their own, and the proof of the main theorem, Theorem 1.2, was obtained entirely by the authors. The model's construction is nonetheless load-bearing: the main result is built by deleting a random subset of the matchings it produces.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

arXiv preprint that routes through a robust-expander result of Kuhn and Osthus; not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.09459 - The perfect 1-factorisation conjecture holds asymptotically

    asymptotic form only; Kotzig's conjecture itself remains far from solved

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.