Problem detail · source-aware

The mod 4 Kawauchi Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Kawauchi conjectured that the Conway polynomial of an amphicheiral knot factors as $\nabla_K(z) = f(z)f(-z)$ for an integer polynomial $f$. Hartley proved it for negative amphicheiral knots and Ermotti, Hongler and Weber published the first counterexample to the general case. The mod 4 form of the conjecture, equivalent to a statement the author conjectured independently in 2006, is true.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

Claude Fable 5

The paper states the proof was produced with the help of Claude Fable 5 and that the draft was prepared in the course of an extended research conversation. The acknowledgements attribute three specific things to the model: the quotient-tower strategy, the level-wise torsion identities, and an initial draft of the main argument.

Provider: Anthropic · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Single-author arXiv preprint; not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.18655 - A proof of the mod 4 Kawauchi Conjecture

    the mod 4 form; the general conjecture is false by Ermotti, Hongler and Weber

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.