ChatGPT 5.6-Sol Pro
Discovered the main proof
Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown
Problem detail · source-aware
Online Shadow Tomography Matching the Classical Bounds
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Precise statement
Online Shadow Tomography with $\log m$ dependence, while retaining $\mathrm{poly}(\log(d)/\epsilon)$ dependence. Also, matching the best classical bounds for Adaptive Data Analysis
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
What AI did
Verification boundary
Unreviewed preprint. The authors state they studied, refined and verified the model's ideas themselves and take full responsibility for every claim, proof and citation; that is the authors checking their own work, so it stays Unreviewed until someone independent looks. Recorded as Resolved rather than Partial because the stated target - matching the classical Adaptive Data Analysis rates - is fully achieved by Theorems 1.2 and 1.3. What remains open is whether those rates are optimal, which was never the question this entry records.
Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none
Timeline
-
arXiv
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Known method families
argument (source-reported)
Source-reported tools: argument.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
What remains uncertain
The source did not supply a subject field. VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.
- VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
- AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
- The source did not supply a subject field. VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.