Problem detail · source-aware

The Period-Index Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

For a Brauer class on a variety, the period-index conjecture bounds the index in terms of the period and the dimension. Disproved: for any uncountable algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic $0$ and any $d \geq 3$ there is a $d$-dimensional variety over $k$ carrying a Brauer class that violates it, for Hodge-theoretic reasons. For $d = 3$ the construction needs no uncountability, so the conjecture fails already over $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}$.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT

The paper's AI disclosure is unusually specific about a partial success. Prompted to find a counterexample by the Hodge-theoretic strategy, ChatGPT produced an example that was flawed, but whose shape survived into the final solution: a quotient of the same form, with an abelian surface, a genus two curve and the group Z/4. The author refined that into the working construction.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2608.03684 - The period-index conjecture is false

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.