Problem detail · source-aware

Complexity of Terminal-Only Manhattan Prim-Dijkstra Routing

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Prim-Dijkstra routing interpolates between a minimum spanning tree and a shortest-path tree, and has been used and improved in VLSI physical design since the early 1990s, but the complexity of the terminal-only Manhattan decision problem was never settled. It is weakly NP-complete. A continuous cost-radius tradeoff with a balanced $(2,2)$ guarantee accompanies the classification.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex

The paper is a designed experiment rather than an incidental use. One model was run under five deliberately incompatible research conditions that differed in premise and information boundary: construct and adversarially audit an NP-completeness proof from the problem definition alone; pursue a polynomial-time exact algorithm blind, without literature or the option of retreating to a hardness claim; pursue the same informed; assume hardness and seek a bicriteria guarantee; and synthesize the record into a solver against an evaluator frozen beforehand. The hardness track produced the NP-completeness proof. The two exact tracks converged on the same architecture and produced counterexamples rather than a proof, which the author treats as a control.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Single-author arXiv preprint with a full NP-completeness proof in Appendix A, a released research record, and a partial Lean snapshot whose theorem boundary the paper states explicitly. Not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.17005 - Provably Good Prim-Dijkstra Revisited: New Theory and a Practical Algorithm for a Classical VLSI Routing Problem with LLMs

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.