Problem detail · source-aware

The Existence Problem for Regular Gabor Frames

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Does every lattice of density above one admit a Gabor frame with a nice window? No. For every dimension $d > 1$ there are explicit criteria on lattices $\Lambda \subset \mathbb{R}^{2d}$ with $D(\Lambda) > 1$ such that no function with continuous Zak transform generates a Gabor frame along $\Lambda$, which answers the existence problem negatively for Schwartz-class windows.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.7

The disclosure separates the two roles: GPT-5.4 was used mainly for mathematical exploration, including exploring whether homology-theoretic methods could give a common-zero criterion for two quasiperiodic functions, while Claude Opus 4.7 assisted with the Lean formalization. The authors verified everything independently. The same group's Cantor Fourier frame paper is also in this catalog.

Provider: OpenAI / Anthropic · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

A Lean formalization accompanies the paper; we have not compiled it. arXiv preprint, not peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2606.26052 - On the existence problem of regular Gabor frames

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.