VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Precise statement
If a smooth bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^n$ admits a Neumann eigenfunction of the Laplacian that is constant on the boundary, must the domain be a ball? Pompeiu posed an equivalent integral-equation form in 1929; Schiffer's 1957 reformulation via Neumann eigenfunctions is the version on Yau's 1982 list (Problem 80), and Williams proved the two formulations logically equivalent for simply connected domains in 1976. Cao-Labora and de Dios Pont construct infinitely many planar domains with large $N$-fold symmetry that are not balls and admit such an eigenfunction, disproving Schiffer's conjecture; applying Williams' classical reduction to the same domains (their Corollary 1.2) disproves Pompeiu's problem as well.
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement
fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
What AI did
GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Fable 5
Models with coding harnesses were used in multiple parts of the research: numerically verifying the asymptotic estimates, producing first drafts of the proofs of the Bessel function estimates, and helping with exposition.
The Lean4 verification of the proof was written by GPT 5.6 from an early draft of the paper. The novel construction strategy is the authors' own.
A day-old preprint. The paper states that a Lean4 verification of the proof was written by GPT 5.6, available at https://github.com/jaumededios/Schiffer. It solves the Pompeiu Problem challenge provided by https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/PompeiuProblem.lean
Also refutes the 1929 Pompeiu problem: Corollary 1.2 applies Williams' classical 1976 equivalence to the same constructed domains, so this is one construction settling both, not two separate results.
Known method families
argument (source-reported)
Source-reported tools: argument.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
What remains uncertain
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.
VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.