GPT Sol 5.6
Absolutely everything, i occasionally steered and redirected.
Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown
Problem detail · source-aware
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
A tournament orients every pair in a round-robin (winner → loser). The score sequence is the sorted win-count list. Reversing a directed 3-cycle never changes scores, so score-equivalent tournaments can look structurally different. Question: Which linear combinations of induced k-subtournament type-counts are score-determined — identical across all tournaments sharing a score sequence, at any host size? Answer: Exactly the linear combinations of degree-multiplicity counts $m_0,\dots,m_{k−1}$, where $m_r$ counts how many of the $k$ chosen vertices have exactly $r$ internal wins. These $k$ functions satisfy one linear relation, so score-determined statistics have dimension $k−1$.
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
Absolutely everything, i occasionally steered and redirected.
Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown
Checked by this site on 17 August 2026: the Zenodo reproducibility archive (21959291, Howard-Stanley) is real and carries the manuscript and code. The classification itself was not checked here, no independent review exists, and - flagged plainly - nobody has swept the tournament-theory literature for prior appearances of this question, which for a self-posed problem is the main risk. The disclosure ("absolutely everything, I occasionally steered") is the frankest ai-discovered claim in the catalog.
Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Source-reported tools: computation.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.