Problem detail · source-aware

Single-Minus Gluon Tree Amplitudes

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Do the tree-level amplitudes $A_n(1^-, 2^+, \dots, n^+)$ vanish identically, or can they be nonzero in half-collinear kinematics - and if nonzero, what is their all-$n$ closed form?

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro derived the piecewise-constant closed formula for every multiplicity; the authors checked it analytically, including against Weinberg's soft theorem.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Analytically checked by the authors against multiple consistency conditions; arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2602.12176 - Single-minus gluon tree amplitudes are nonzero

    nonzero on half-collinear complex kinematics, with a closed formula

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.