GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro derived the piecewise-constant closed formula for every multiplicity; the authors checked it analytically, including against Weinberg's soft theorem.
Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown
Problem detail · source-aware
VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.
Do the tree-level amplitudes $A_n(1^-, 2^+, \dots, n^+)$ vanish identically, or can they be nonzero in half-collinear kinematics - and if nonzero, what is their all-$n$ closed form?
The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.
GPT-5.2 Pro derived the piecewise-constant closed formula for every multiplicity; the authors checked it analytically, including against Weinberg's soft theorem.
Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown
Analytically checked by the authors against multiple consistency conditions; arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.
Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none
nonzero on half-collinear complex kinematics, with a closed formula
Source-reported tools: construction.
Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0
VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.