Problem detail · source-aware

Sivaraman's Perfect-Divisibility Characterization Question

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Sivaraman asked whether perfect divisibility is characterized by its chromatic consequence: is a graph $G$ perfectly divisible if and only if $\chi(H) \le \binom{\omega(H)+1}{2}$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$? False: the Paley graph $P(17)$ satisfies the chromatic bound hereditarily but is not perfectly divisible.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT

The acknowledgement states that the Paley graph P(17) - the counterexample witness - was identified during exploratory use of ChatGPT and subsequently verified by the authors, with ChatGPT also used for language polishing and generating the verification code. All arguments and computations were checked by the authors.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Checked by this site on 17 August 2026 against the paper's LaTeX (arXiv:2608.14519, Wang-Xia): the question is stated as Question 1 with attribution to Sivaraman by personal communication, the negative answer via P(17) is Theorem-level, and the acknowledgement is verbatim as quoted. The P(17) computation was not re-run here. The paper's larger content - perfect and linear divisibility of chair-free graphs - is human work outside this entry's claim. Days old, no independent review.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. Perfect Divisibility, Linear Divisibility and Chair-Free Graphs

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

construction (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: construction.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.