Problem detail · source-aware

Lower Bounds for Stepsize-Based Acceleration of Gradient Descent

partialconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as partial. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Carefully designed stepsize schedules alone accelerate plain gradient descent beyond its textbook O(1/T) rate, without momentum. Whether they can reach the optimal O(T^-2) was open. A lower bound of Omega(T^-1.9319) for last-iterate convergence under predetermined nonnegative stepsize schedules says they cannot.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro

The abstract closes with it: "The proof was developed by GPT-5.6 Sol Pro under the authors' guidance." The authors added material to make the proof correct and readable, and separately used Codex to formalize the proof in Lean 4.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

A preprint days old. A Lean 4 formalization by Codex is linked from the paper, but it is the same pipeline that produced the proof, so it is not independent confirmation.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv

    Recorded as partial: the bound is Omega(T^-1.9319) against an achievable O(T^-1.2716), so it rules out reaching the optimal rate without pinning down the true one.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.