Problem detail · source-aware

Strict Cosingularity and Adjoints for Separable Range

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Pełczyński's duality between strictly singular and strictly cosingular operators fails without weak compactness. Beanland asked, in work with Androulakis and later on MathOverflow, for the separable-range case: the paper answers it affirmatively and shows that for separable $X$, $T$ is strictly cosingular exactly when $T^{*}$ is strictly singular.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

ChatGPT 5.5 Pro

ChatGPT 5.5 Pro, driven directly and through Codex agents over a filesystem, generated the key ideas and the proof; the authors verified and refined it. The paper reports that the model sometimes misattributed a theorem, cited a result imprecisely, or presented steps as immediate when they still needed checking, so the human verification was load-bearing. The authors state none of these results came from the newer generation of models.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

No independent check. The proof stands on verification by the paper's authors, who describe correcting misattributions and filling in steps the model presented as immediate. Preprint, not refereed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.