Problem detail · source-aware

The Umans-Wang Arithmetic-Progression Divisor Conjecture

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

An $n$-divisor set contains a multiple of every integer from 1 to $n$. Umans and Wang proposed, as the arithmetic-progression form of their Strong $(\alpha,\beta)$-Divisor Conjecture, that such a progression exists with few terms of bounded magnitude, which would imply faster algorithms for polynomial and integer factorization. Refuted unconditionally, including its exponent-level relaxation.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.6 Sol (via Codex, reasoning effort ultra)

"The proof was discovered in an OpenAI Codex run using the gpt-5.6-sol model with reasoning effort set to ultra. Codex also produced the initial write-up. Subsequent human review verified the proof, reviewed the citations, and revised the exposition." The authors note the prompting strategy borrowed from the UCLA Moonshot Harness project.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

A preprint days old with no independent review. The paper states the argument is self-contained, needs no computer-assisted calculation and no access to the model transcript, with the prime number theorem as its only analytic input, so it is checkable on its own terms.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.