Minimax Rate for Density Estimation under Wasserstein Contamination

Precise statement

What is the minimax optimal error rate for density estimation when observations are perturbed by Wasserstein-bounded contaminations? Chao and Dobriban's 2023 preprint left a gap between upper and lower bounds; the sharp rate is now derived, closing the problem.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5 Pro

A note written expressly to document the workflow: starting October 2025, "making significant use of GPT-5 Pro, we were able to derive the minimax optimal error rate." The model suggested calculations the authors had not thought of and techniques unfamiliar to them; the note also records the AI's limitations in its own section.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

No verification note supplied.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

1. 2025-11-24

   arXiv

   VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

• VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
• AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
• VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.