Problem detail · source-aware

The Yun-Sra-Jadbabaie SS-RS-GD Inequalities

resolvedconfidence 70%

VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Precise statement

Yun, Sra and Jadbabaie posed as a COLT 2021 open question whether, for well-conditioned symmetric matrices, the operators encoding the expected iterate of single-shuffle SGD, random-reshuffle SGD and gradient descent on a quadratic finite sum satisfy $\|W_{ss}\| \le \|W_{rs}\| \le \|W_{gd}\|$. They do.

The source statement is reproduced for indexing with attribution. Mathematical correctness requires domain-expert or mechanical review. VibeMath has not independently audited statement fidelity, correctness, priority, or novelty.

What AI did

GPT-5.5 Pro (extended)

The paper states the proof was found via GPT-5.5 Pro prompted by the author, and a footnote says the proof idea was completely generated by the model, linking the shared conversation. The write-up was assembled by the author.

Provider: OpenAI · Prompt public: unknown · Independence: unknown

Verification boundary

unreviewed

Single-author arXiv preprint with the originating conversation linked; not yet peer-reviewed.

Correctness: unknown · statement fidelity: unaudited · peer review: none

Timeline

  1. arXiv:2607.22620 - A Resolution of the SS-RS-GD Inequalities

    VibeMathed reports this item as resolved. VibeMath preserves that report as a source assertion and has not independently authored a plain-language mathematical explanation.

Known method families

argument (source-reported)

Source-reported tools: argument.

Independent: unknown · difference confidence: 0

What remains uncertain

VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.

  • VibeMath has not independently verified the mathematical claim.
  • AI-attempt independence and training-data exposure are unknown unless explicitly documented.
  • VibeMath has not independently audited the mathematical statement, proof, or novelty claim.